In the article I had searched up it had used Yersinia pestis
to research into other strands, more recent ones that do cause problems in the
present. Although nothing could compare to its predecessors catastrophic
impacts on the worlds society. The researches however thought if we could
expand research into the older strain perhaps we would be able to understand
the new daughter strains. The article is
a little broad and utilizes huge vocabulary words that would be somewhat
confusing to the average reader, it feels as if the article is meant for PH.D’s
and professors. Although the article is broad in its vocabulary uses it still
gets its point across affectively.
Picture: http://media-2.web.britannica.com/eb-media/22/19422-004-634AA551.jpg
The idea to introduce an older strand to possibly come up
with solutions for younger strains is scary, the plague back in time wiped out
millions of people automatically comes up, what is there was a possible
contamination or leak. Although it is dangerous the article does explain why it
is so important for us to study the older one, it could save thousands of
lives. Also it explains how sequencing a small amount of Genetic code would
also get rid of the risk factor reassuring us that the risks are low. The
article does lack in the sense it is targeting a certain audience, if the
article would be broader in vocabulary uses maybe it would attract some younger
people to read it. All in all though the article is interesting and very
effective in relaying its purpose, research and data. Although it is difficult
to understand at first that doesn’t sway the reader at all, it also introduces
an interesting idea, should we research other dangerous microbes which impacted
our history to perhaps save lives in the present?
Article: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0049803
You've raised good questions!
ReplyDelete